Gibbon's The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire
Home | Prev
| Next
| Contents
Chapter XLVIII: Succession And Characters Of The Greek Emperors.
Part II.
In rewarding his allies, and recalling his wife, Justinian
displayed some sense of honor and gratitude; ^* and Terbelis
retired, after sweeping away a heap of gold coin, which he
measured with his Scythian whip. But never was vow more
religiously performed than the sacred oath of revenge which he
had sworn amidst the storms of the Euxine. The two usurpers (for
I must reserve the name of tyrant for the conqueror) were dragged
into the hippodrome, the one from his prison, the other from his
palace. Before their execution, Leontius and Apsimar were cast
prostrate in chains beneath the throne of the emperor; and
Justinian, planting a foot on each of their necks, contemplated
above an hour the chariot-race, while the inconstant people
shouted, in the words of the Psalmist, "Thou shalt trample on the
asp and basilisk, and on the lion and dragon shalt thou set thy
foot!" The universal defection which he had once experienced
might provoke him to repeat the wish of Caligula, that the Roman
people had but one head. Yet I shall presume to observe, that
such a wish is unworthy of an ingenious tyrant, since his revenge
and cruelty would have been extinguished by a single blow,
instead of the slow variety of tortures which Justinian inflicted
on the victims of his anger. His pleasures were inexhaustible:
neither private virtue nor public service could expiate the guilt
of active, or even passive, obedience to an established
government; and, during the six years of his new reign, he
considered the axe, the cord, and the rack, as the only
instruments of royalty. But his most implacable hatred was
pointed against the Chersonites, who had insulted his exile and
violated the laws of hospitality. Their remote situation
afforded some means of defence, or at least of escape; and a
grievous tax was imposed on Constantinople, to supply the
preparations of a fleet and army. "All are guilty, and all must
perish," was the mandate of Justinian; and the bloody execution
was intrusted to his favorite Stephen, who was recommended by the
epithet of the savage. Yet even the savage Stephen imperfectly
accomplished the intentions of his sovereign. The slowness of
his attack allowed the greater part of the inhabitants to
withdraw into the country; and the minister of vengeance
contented himself with reducing the youth of both sexes to a
state of servitude, with roasting alive seven of the principal
citizens, with drowning twenty in the sea, and with reserving
forty-two in chains to receive their doom from the mouth of the
emperor. In their return, the fleet was driven on the rocky
shores of Anatolia; and Justinian applauded the obedience of the
Euxine, which had involved so many thousands of his subjects and
enemies in a common shipwreck: but the tyrant was still insatiate
of blood; and a second expedition was commanded to extirpate the
remains of the proscribed colony. In the short interval, the
Chersonites had returned to their city, and were prepared to die
in arms; the khan of the Chozars had renounced the cause of his
odious brother; the exiles of every province were assembled in
Tauris; and Bardanes, under the name of Philippicus, was invested
with the purple. The Imperial troops, unwilling and unable to
perpetrate the revenge of Justinian, escaped his displeasure by
abjuring his allegiance: the fleet, under their new sovereign,
steered back a more auspicious course to the harbors of Sinope
and Constantinople; and every tongue was prompt to pronounce,
every hand to execute, the death of the tyrant. Destitute of
friends, he was deserted by his Barbarian guards; and the stroke
of the assassin was praised as an act of patriotism and Roman
virtue. His son Tiberius had taken refuge in a church; his aged
grandmother guarded the door; and the innocent youth, suspending
round his neck the most formidable relics, embraced with one hand
the altar, with the other the wood of the true cross. But the
popular fury that dares to trample on superstition, is deaf to
the cries of humanity; and the race of Heraclius was extinguished
after a reign of one hundred years
[Footnote *: Of fear rather than of more generous motives.
Compare Le Beau vol. xii. p. 64. - M.]
Between the fall of the Heraclian and the rise of the
Isaurian dynasty, a short interval of six years is divided into
three reigns. Bardanes, or Philippicus, was hailed at
Constantinople as a hero who had delivered his country from a
tyrant; and he might taste some moments of happiness in the first
transports of sincere and universal joy. Justinian had left
behind him an ample treasure, the fruit of cruelty and rapine:
but this useful fund was soon and idly dissipated by his
successor. On the festival of his birthday, Philippicus
entertained the multitude with the games of the hippodrome; from
thence he paraded through the streets with a thousand banners and
a thousand trumpets; refreshed himself in the baths of Zeuxippus,
and returning to the palace, entertained his nobles with a
sumptuous banquet. At the meridian hour he withdrew to his
chamber, intoxicated with flattery and wine, and forgetful that
his example had made every subject ambitious, and that every
ambitious subject was his secret enemy. Some bold conspirators
introduced themselves in the disorder of the feast; and the
slumbering monarch was surprised, bound, blinded, and deposed,
before he was sensible of his danger. Yet the traitors were
deprived of their reward; and the free voice of the senate and
people promoted Artemius from the office of secretary to that of
emperor: he assumed the title of Anastasius the Second, and
displayed in a short and troubled reign the virtues both of peace
and war. But after the extinction of the Imperial line, the rule
of obedience was violated, and every change diffused the seeds of
new revolutions. In a mutiny of the fleet, an obscure and
reluctant officer of the revenue was forcibly invested with the
purple: after some months of a naval war, Anastasius resigned the
sceptre; and the conqueror, Theodosius the Third, submitted in
his turn to the superior ascendant of Leo, the general and
emperor of the Oriental troops. His two predecessors were
permitted to embrace the ecclesiastical profession: the restless
impatience of Anastasius tempted him to risk and to lose his life
in a treasonable enterprise; but the last days of Theodosius were
honorable and secure. The single sublime word, "Health," which
he inscribed on his tomb, expresses the confidence of philosophy
or religion; and the fame of his miracles was long preserved
among the people of Ephesus. This convenient shelter of the
church might sometimes impose a lesson of clemency; but it may be
questioned whether it is for the public interest to diminish the
perils of unsuccessful ambition.
I have dwelt on the fall of a tyrant; I shall briefly
represent the founder of a new dynasty, who is known to posterity
by the invectives of his enemies, and whose public and private
life is involved in the ecclesiastical story of the Iconoclasts.
Yet in spite of the clamors of superstition, a favorable
prejudice for the character of Leo the Isaurian may be reasonably
drawn from the obscurity of his birth, and the duration of his
reign. - I. In an age of manly spirit, the prospect of an
Imperial reward would have kindled every energy of the mind, and
produced a crowd of competitors as deserving as they were
desirous to reign. Even in the corruption and debility of the
modern Greeks, the elevation of a plebeian from the last to the
first rank of society, supposes some qualifications above the
level of the multitude. He would probably be ignorant and
disdainful of speculative science; and, in the pursuit of
fortune, he might absolve himself from the obligations of
benevolence and justice; but to his character we may ascribe the
useful virtues of prudence and fortitude, the knowledge of
mankind, and the important art of gaining their confidence and
directing their passions. It is agreed that Leo was a native of
Isauria, and that Conon was his primitive name. The writers,
whose awkward satire is praise, describe him as an itinerant
pedler, who drove an ass with some paltry merchandise to the
country fairs; and foolishly relate that he met on the road some
Jewish fortune-tellers, who promised him the Roman empire, on
condition that he should abolish the worship of idols. A more
probable account relates the migration of his father from Asia
Minor to Thrace, where he exercised the lucrative trade of a
grazier; and he must have acquired considerable wealth, since the
first introduction of his son was procured by a supply of five
hundred sheep to the Imperial camp. His first service was in the
guards of Justinian, where he soon attracted the notice, and by
degrees the jealousy, of the tyrant. His valor and dexterity
were conspicuous in the Colchian war: from Anastasius he received
the command of the Anatolian legions, and by the suffrage of the
soldiers he was raised to the empire with the general applause of
the Roman world. - II. In this dangerous elevation, Leo the
Third supported himself against the envy of his equals, the
discontent of a powerful faction, and the assaults of his foreign
and domestic enemies. The Catholics, who accuse his religious
innovations, are obliged to confess that they were undertaken
with temper and conducted with firmness. Their silence respects
the wisdom of his administration and the purity of his manners.
After a reign of twenty-four years, he peaceably expired in the
palace of Constantinople; and the purple which he had acquired
was transmitted by the right of inheritance to the third
generation. ^*
[Footnote *: During the latter part of his reign, the hostilities
of the Saracens, who invested a Pergamenian, named Tiberius, with
the purple, and proclaimed him as the son of Justinian, and an
earthquake, which destroyed the walls of Constantinople,
compelled Leo greatly to increase the burdens of taxation upon
his subjects. A twelfth was exacted in addition to every aurena
as a wall tax. Theophanes p. 275 Schlosser, Bilder eturmeud
Kaiser, p. 197. - M.]
In a long reign of thirty-four years, the son and successor
of Leo, Constantine the Fifth, surnamed Copronymus, attacked with
less temperate zeal the images or idols of the church. Their
votaries have exhausted the bitterness of religious gall, in
their portrait of this spotted panther, this antichrist, this
flying dragon of the serpent's seed, who surpassed the vices of
Elagabalus and Nero. His reign was a long butchery of whatever
was most noble, or holy, or innocent, in his empire. In person,
the emperor assisted at the execution of his victims, surveyed
their agonies, listened to their groans, and indulged, without
satiating, his appetite for blood: a plate of noses was accepted
as a grateful offering, and his domestics were often scourged or
mutilated by the royal hand. His surname was derived from his
pollution of his baptismal font. The infant might be excused;
but the manly pleasures of Copronymus degraded him below the
level of a brute; his lust confounded the eternal distinctions of
sex and species, and he seemed to extract some unnatural delight
from the objects most offensive to human sense. In his religion
the Iconoclast was a Heretic, a Jew, a Mahometan, a Pagan, and an
Atheist; and his belief of an invisible power could be discovered
only in his magic rites, human victims, and nocturnal sacrifices
to Venus and the daemons of antiquity. His life was stained with
the most opposite vices, and the ulcers which covered his body,
anticipated before his death the sentiment of hell-tortures. Of
these accusations, which I have so patiently copied, a part is
refuted by its own absurdity; and in the private anecdotes of the
life of the princes, the lie is more easy as the detection is
more difficult. Without adopting the pernicious maxim, that where
much is alleged, something must be true, I can however discern,
that Constantine the Fifth was dissolute and cruel. Calumny is
more prone to exaggerate than to invent; and her licentious
tongue is checked in some measure by the experience of the age
and country to which she appeals. Of the bishops and monks, the
generals and magistrates, who are said to have suffered under his
reign, the numbers are recorded, the names were conspicuous, the
execution was public, the mutilation visible and permanent. ^*
The Catholics hated the person and government of Copronymus; but
even their hatred is a proof of their oppression. They
dissembled the provocations which might excuse or justify his
rigor, but even these provocations must gradually inflame his
resentment and harden his temper in the use or the abuse of
despotism. Yet the character of the fifth Constantine was not
devoid of merit, nor did his government always deserve the curses
or the contempt of the Greeks. From the confession of his
enemies, I am informed of the restoration of an ancient aqueduct,
of the redemption of two thousand five hundred captives, of the
uncommon plenty of the times, and of the new colonies with which
he repeopled Constantinople and the Thracian cities. They
reluctantly praise his activity and courage; he was on horseback
in the field at the head of his legions; and, although the
fortune of his arms was various, he triumphed by sea and land, on
the Euphrates and the Danube, in civil and Barbarian war.
Heretical praise must be cast into the scale to counterbalance
the weight of orthodox invective. The Iconoclasts revered the
virtues of the prince: forty years after his death they still
prayed before the tomb of the saint. A miraculous vision was
propagated by fanaticism or fraud: and the Christian hero
appeared on a milk-white steed, brandishing his lance against the
Pagans of Bulgaria: "An absurd fable," says the Catholic
historian, "since Copronymus is chained with the daemons in the
abyss of hell."
[Footnote *: He is accused of burning the library of
Constantinople, founded by Julian, with its president and twelve
professors. This eastern Sorbonne had discomfited the Imperial
theologians on the great question of image worship. Schlosser
observes that this accidental fire took place six years after the
emperor had laid the question of image-worship before the
professors. Bilder sturmand Kaiser, p. 294. Compare Le Heau.
vol. xl. p. 156. - M.]
Leo the Fourth, the son of the fifth and the father of the
sixth Constantine, was of a feeble constitution both of mind ^*
and body, and the principal care of his reign was the settlement
of the succession. The association of the young Constantine was
urged by the officious zeal of his subjects; and the emperor,
conscious of his decay, complied, after a prudent hesitation,
with their unanimous wishes. The royal infant, at the age of
five years, was crowned with his mother Irene; and the national
consent was ratified by every circumstance of pomp and solemnity,
that could dazzle the eyes or bind the conscience of the Greeks.
An oath of fidelity was administered in the palace, the church,
and the hippodrome, to the several orders of the state, who
adjured the holy names of the Son, and mother of God. "Be
witness, O Christ! that we will watch over the safety of
Constantine the son of Leo, expose our lives in his service, and
bear true allegiance to his person and posterity." They pledged
their faith on the wood of the true cross, and the act of their
engagement was deposited on the altar of St. Sophia. The first
to swear, and the first to violate their oath, were the five sons
of Copronymus by a second marriage; and the story of these
princes is singular and tragic. The right of primogeniture
excluded them from the throne; the injustice of their elder
brother defrauded them of a legacy of about two millions
sterling; some vain titles were not deemed a sufficient
compensation for wealth and power; and they repeatedly conspired
against their nephew, before and after the death of his father.
Their first attempt was pardoned; for the second offence ^! they
were condemned to the ecclesiastical state; and for the third
treason, Nicephorus, the eldest and most guilty, was deprived of
his eyes, and his four brothers, Christopher, Nicetas, Anthemeus,
and Eudoxas, were punished, as a milder sentence, by the
amputation of their tongues. After five years' confinement, they
escaped to the church of St. Sophia, and displayed a pathetic
spectacle to the people. "Countrymen and Christians," cried
Nicephorus for himself and his mute brethren, "behold the sons of
your emperor, if you can still recognize our features in this
miserable state. A life, an imperfect life, is all that the
malice of our enemies has spared. It is now threatened, and we
now throw ourselves on your compassion." The rising murmur might
have produced a revolution, had it not been checked by the
presence of a minister, who soothed the unhappy princes with
flattery and hope, and gently drew them from the sanctuary to the
palace. They were speedily embarked for Greece, and Athens was
allotted for the place of their exile. In this calm retreat, and
in their helpless condition, Nicephorus and his brothers were
tormented by the thirst of power, and tempted by a Sclavonian
chief, who offered to break their prison, and to lead them in
arms, and in the purple, to the gates of Constantinople. But the
Athenian people, ever zealous in the cause of Irene, prevented
her justice or cruelty; and the five sons of Copronymus were
plunged in eternal darkness and oblivion.
[Footnote *: Schlosser thinks more highly of Leo's mind; but his
only proof of his superiority is the successes of his generals
against the Saracens, Schlosser, p. 256. - M.]
[Footnote !: The second offence was on the accession of the young
Constantine - M.]
For himself, that emperor had chosen a Barbarian wife, the
daughter of the khan of the Chozars; but in the marriage of his
heir, he preferred an Athenian virgin, an orphan, seventeen years
old, whose sole fortune must have consisted in her personal
accomplishments. The nuptials of Leo and Irene were celebrated
with royal pomp; she soon acquired the love and confidence of a
feeble husband, and in his testament he declared the empress
guardian of the Roman world, and of their son Constantine the
Sixth, who was no more than ten years of age. During his
childhood, Irene most ably and assiduously discharged, in her
public administration, the duties of a faithful mother; and her
zeal in the restoration of images has deserved the name and
honors of a saint, which she still occupies in the Greek
calendar. But the emperor attained the maturity of youth; the
maternal yoke became more grievous; and he listened to the
favorites of his own age, who shared his pleasures, and were
ambitious of sharing his power. Their reasons convinced him of
his right, their praises of his ability, to reign; and he
consented to reward the services of Irene by a perpetual
banishment to the Isle of Sicily. But her vigilance and
penetration easily disconcerted their rash projects: a similar,
or more severe, punishment was retaliated on themselves and their
advisers; and Irene inflicted on the ungrateful prince the
chastisement of a boy. After this contest, the mother and the son
were at the head of two domestic factions; and instead of mild
influence and voluntary obedience, she held in chains a captive
and an enemy. The empress was overthrown by the abuse of
victory; the oath of fidelity, which she exacted to herself
alone, was pronounced with reluctant murmurs; and the bold
refusal of the Armenian guards encouraged a free and general
declaration, that Constantine the Sixth was the lawful emperor of
the Romans. In this character he ascended his hereditary throne,
and dismissed Irene to a life of solitude and repose. But her
haughty spirit condescended to the arts of dissimulation: she
flattered the bishops and eunuchs, revived the filial tenderness
of the prince, regained his confidence, and betrayed his
credulity. The character of Constantine was not destitute of
sense or spirit; but his education had been studiously neglected;
and the ambitious mother exposed to the public censure the vices
which she had nourished, and the actions which she had secretly
advised: his divorce and second marriage offended the prejudices
of the clergy, and by his imprudent rigor he forfeited the
attachment of the Armenian guards. A powerful conspiracy was
formed for the restoration of Irene; and the secret, though
widely diffused, was faithfully kept above eight months, till the
emperor, suspicious of his danger, escaped from Constantinople,
with the design of appealing to the provinces and armies. By this
hasty flight, the empress was left on the brink of the precipice;
yet before she implored the mercy of her son, Irene addressed a
private epistle to the friends whom she had placed about his
person, with a menace, that unless they accomplished, she would
reveal, their treason. Their fear rendered them intrepid; they
seized the emperor on the Asiatic shore, and he was transported
to the porphyry apartment of the palace, where he had first seen
the light. In the mind of Irene, ambition had stifled every
sentiment of humanity and nature; and it was decreed in her
bloody council, that Constantine should be rendered incapable of
the throne: her emissaries assaulted the sleeping prince, and
stabbed their daggers with such violence and precipitation into
his eyes as if they meant to execute a mortal sentence. An
ambiguous passage of Theophanes persuaded the annalist of the
church that death was the immediate consequence of this barbarous
execution. The Catholics have been deceived or subdued by the
authority of Baronius; and Protestant zeal has reechoed the words
of a cardinal, desirous, as it should seem, to favor the
patroness of images. ^* Yet the blind son of Irene survived many
years, oppressed by the court and forgotten by the world; the
Isaurian dynasty was silently extinguished; and the memory of
Constantine was recalled only by the nuptials of his daughter
Euphrosyne with the emperor Michael the Second.
[Footnote *: Gibbon has been attacked on account of this
statement, but is successfully defended by Schlosser. B S. Kaiser
-
327. Compare Le Beau, c. xii p. 372. - M.]
The most bigoted orthodoxy has justly execrated the
unnatural mother, who may not easily be paralleled in the history
of crimes. To her bloody deed superstition has attributed a
subsequent darkness of seventeen days; during which many vessels
in midday were driven from their course, as if the sun, a globe
of fire so vast and so remote, could sympathize with the atoms of
a revolving planet. On earth, the crime of Irene was left five
years unpunished; her reign was crowned with external splendor;
and if she could silence the voice of conscience, she neither
heard nor regarded the reproaches of mankind. The Roman world
bowed to the government of a female; and as she moved through the
streets of Constantinople, the reins of four milk-white steeds
were held by as many patricians, who marched on foot before the
golden chariot of their queen. But these patricians were for the
most part eunuchs; and their black ingratitude justified, on this
occasion, the popular hatred and contempt. Raised, enriched,
intrusted with the first dignities of the empire, they basely
conspired against their benefactress; the great treasurer
Nicephorus was secretly invested with the purple; her successor
was introduced into the palace, and crowned at St. Sophia by the
venal patriarch. In their first interview, she recapitulated
with dignity the revolutions of her life, gently accused the
perfidy of Nicephorus, insinuated that he owed his life to her
unsuspicious clemency, and for the throne and treasures which she
resigned, solicited a decent and honorable retreat. His avarice
refused this modest compensation; and, in her exile of the Isle
of Lesbos, the empress earned a scanty subsistence by the labors
of her distaff.
Many tyrants have reigned undoubtedly more criminal than
Nicephorus, but none perhaps have more deeply incurred the
universal abhorrence of their people. His character was stained
with the three odious vices of hypocrisy, ingratitude, and
avarice: his want of virtue was not redeemed by any superior
talents, nor his want of talents by any pleasing qualifications.
Unskilful and unfortunate in war, Nicephorus was vanquished by
the Saracens, and slain by the Bulgarians; and the advantage of
his death overbalanced, in the public opinion, the destruction of
a Roman army. ^* His son and heir Stauracius escaped from the
field with a mortal wound; yet six months of an expiring life
were sufficient to refute his indecent, though popular
declaration, that he would in all things avoid the example of his
father. On the near prospect of his decease, Michael, the great
master of the palace, and the husband of his sister Procopia, was
named by every person of the palace and city, except by his
envious brother. Tenacious of a sceptre now falling from his
hand, he conspired against the life of his successor, and
cherished the idea of changing to a democracy the Roman empire.
But these rash projects served only to inflame the zeal of the
people and to remove the scruples of the candidate: Michael the
First accepted the purple, and before he sunk into the grave the
son of Nicephorus implored the clemency of his new sovereign.
Had Michael in an age of peace ascended an hereditary throne, he
might have reigned and died the father of his people: but his
mild virtues were adapted to the shade of private life, nor was
he capable of controlling the ambition of his equals, or of
resisting the arms of the victorious Bulgarians. While his want
of ability and success exposed him to the contempt of the
soldiers, the masculine spirit of his wife Procopia awakened
their indignation. Even the Greeks of the ninth century were
provoked by the insolence of a female, who, in the front of the
standards, presumed to direct their discipline and animate their
valor; and their licentious clamors advised the new Semiramis to
reverence the majesty of a Roman camp. After an unsuccessful
campaign, the emperor left, in their winter-quarters of Thrace, a
disaffected army under the command of his enemies; and their
artful eloquence persuaded the soldiers to break the dominion of
the eunuchs, to degrade the husband of Procopia, and to assert
the right of a military election. They marched towards the
capital: yet the clergy, the senate, and the people of
Constantinople, adhered to the cause of Michael; and the troops
and treasures of Asia might have protracted the mischiefs of
civil war. But his humanity (by the ambitious it will be termed
his weakness) protested that not a drop of Christian blood should
be shed in his quarrel, and his messengers presented the
conquerors with the keys of the city and the palace. They were
disarmed by his innocence and submission; his life and his eyes
were spared; and the Imperial monk enjoyed the comforts of
solitude and religion above thirty-two years after he had been
stripped of the purple and separated from his wife.
[Footnote *: The Syrian historian Aboulfaradj. Chron. Syr. p.
133, 139, speaks of him as a brave, prudent, and pious prince,
formidable to the Arabs. St. Martin, c. xii. p. 402. Compare
Schlosser, p. 350. - M.]
A rebel, in the time of Nicephorus, the famous and
unfortunate Bardanes, had once the curiosity to consult an
Asiatic prophet, who, after prognosticating his fall, announced
the fortunes of his three principal officers, Leo the Armenian,
Michael the Phrygian, and Thomas the Cappadocian, the successive
reigns of the two former, the fruitless and fatal enterprise of
the third. This prediction was verified, or rather was produced,
by the event. Ten years afterwards, when the Thracian camp
rejected the husband of Procopia, the crown was presented to the
same Leo, the first in military rank and the secret author of the
mutiny. As he affected to hesitate, "With this sword," said his
companion Michael, "I will open the gates of Constantinople to
your Imperial sway; or instantly plunge it into your bosom, if
you obstinately resist the just desires of your fellow-soldiers."
The compliance of the Armenian was rewarded with the empire, and
he reigned seven years and a half under the name of Leo the
Fifth. Educated in a camp, and ignorant both of laws and
letters, he introduced into his civil government the rigor and
even cruelty of military discipline; but if his severity was
sometimes dangerous to the innocent, it was always formidable to
the guilty. His religious inconstancy was taxed by the epithet
of Chameleon, but the Catholics have acknowledged by the voice of
a saint and confessors, that the life of the Iconoclast was
useful to the republic. The zeal of his companion Michael was
repaid with riches, honors, and military command; and his
subordinate talents were beneficially employed in the public
service. Yet the Phrygian was dissatisfied at receiving as a
favor a scanty portion of the Imperial prize which he had
bestowed on his equal; and his discontent, which sometimes
evaporated in hasty discourse, at length assumed a more
threatening and hostile aspect against a prince whom he
represented as a cruel tyrant. That tyrant, however, repeatedly
detected, warned, and dismissed the old companion of his arms,
till fear and resentment prevailed over gratitude; and Michael,
after a scrutiny into his actions and designs, was convicted of
treason, and sentenced to be burnt alive in the furnace of the
private baths. The devout humanity of the empress Theophano was
fatal to her husband and family. A solemn day, the twenty-fifth
of December, had been fixed for the execution: she urged, that
the anniversary of the Savior's birth would be profaned by this
inhuman spectacle, and Leo consented with reluctance to a decent
respite. But on the vigil of the feast his sleepless anxiety
prompted him to visit at the dead of night the chamber in which
his enemy was confined: he beheld him released from his chain,
and stretched on his jailer's bed in a profound slumber. Leo was
alarmed at these signs of security and intelligence; but though
he retired with silent steps, his entrance and departure were
noticed by a slave who lay concealed in a corner of the prison.
Under the pretence of requesting the spiritual aid of a
confessor, Michael informed the conspirators, that their lives
depended on his discretion, and that a few hours were left to
assure their own safety, by the deliverance of their friend and
country. On the great festivals, a chosen band of priests and
chanters was admitted into the palace by a private gate to sing
matins in the chapel; and Leo, who regulated with the same
strictness the discipline of the choir and of the camp, was
seldom absent from these early devotions. In the ecclesiastical
habit, but with their swords under their robes, the conspirators
mingled with the procession, lurked in the angles of the chapel,
and expected, as the signal of murder, the intonation of the
first psalm by the emperor himself. The imperfect light, and the
uniformity of dress, might have favored his escape, whilst their
assault was pointed against a harmless priest; but they soon
discovered their mistake, and encompassed on all sides the royal
victim. Without a weapon and without a friend, he grasped a
weighty cross, and stood at bay against the hunters of his life;
but as he asked for mercy, "This is the hour, not of mercy, but
of vengeance," was the inexorable reply. The stroke of a
well-aimed sword separated from his body the right arm and the
cross, and Leo the Armenian was slain at the foot of the altar.
A memorable reverse of fortune was displayed in Michael the
Second, who from a defect in his speech was surnamed the
Stammerer. He was snatched from the fiery furnace to the
sovereignty of an empire; and as in the tumult a smith could not
readily be found, the fetters remained on his legs several hours
after he was seated on the throne of the Caesars. The royal
blood which had been the price of his elevation, was unprofitably
spent: in the purple he retained the ignoble vices of his origin;
and Michael lost his provinces with as supine indifference as if
they had been the inheritance of his fathers. His title was
disputed by Thomas, the last of the military triumvirate, who
transported into Europe fourscore thousand Barbarians from the
banks of the Tigris and the shores of the Caspian. He formed the
siege of Constantinople; but the capital was defended with
spiritual and carnal weapons; a Bulgarian king assaulted the camp
of the Orientals, and Thomas had the misfortune, or the weakness,
to fall alive into the power of the conqueror. The hands and
feet of the rebel were amputated; he was placed on an ass, and,
amidst the insults of the people, was led through the streets,
which he sprinkled with his blood. The depravation of manners,
as savage as they were corrupt, is marked by the presence of the
emperor himself. Deaf to the lamentation of a fellow-soldier, he
incessantly pressed the discovery of more accomplices, till his
curiosity was checked by the question of an honest or guilty
minister: "Would you give credit to an enemy against the most
faithful of your friends?" After the death of his first wife, the
emperor, at the request of the senate, drew from her monastery
Euphrosyne, the daughter of Constantine the Sixth. Her august
birth might justify a stipulation in the marriage-contract, that
her children should equally share the empire with their elder
brother. But the nuptials of Michael and Euphrosyne were barren;
and she was content with the title of mother of Theophilus, his
son and successor.
The character of Theophilus is a rare example in which
religious zeal has allowed, and perhaps magnified, the virtues of
a heretic and a persecutor. His valor was often felt by the
enemies, and his justice by the subjects, of the monarchy; but
the valor of Theophilus was rash and fruitless, and his justice
arbitrary and cruel. He displayed the banner of the cross
against the Saracens; but his five expeditions were concluded by
a signal overthrow: Amorium, the native city of his ancestors,
was levelled with the ground and from his military toils he
derived only the surname of the Unfortunate. The wisdom of a
sovereign is comprised in the institution of laws and the choice
of magistrates, and while he seems without action, his civil
government revolves round his centre with the silence and order
of the planetary system. But the justice of Theophilus was
fashioned on the model of the Oriental despots, who, in personal
and irregular acts of authority, consult the reason or passion of
the moment, without measuring the sentence by the law, or the
penalty by the offense. A poor woman threw herself at the
emperor's feet to complain of a powerful neighbor, the brother of
the empress, who had raised his palace-wall to such an
inconvenient height, that her humble dwelling was excluded from
light and air! On the proof of the fact, instead of granting,
like an ordinary judge, sufficient or ample damages to the
plaintiff, the sovereign adjudged to her use and benefit the
palace and the ground. Nor was Theophilus content with this
extravagant satisfaction: his zeal converted a civil trespass
into a criminal act; and the unfortunate patrician was stripped
and scourged in the public place of Constantinople. For some
venial offenses, some defect of equity or vigilance, the
principal ministers, a praefect, a quaestor, a captain of the
guards, were banished or mutilated, or scalded with boiling
pitch, or burnt alive in the hippodrome; and as these dreadful
examples might be the effects of error or caprice, they must have
alienated from his service the best and wisest of the citizens.
But the pride of the monarch was flattered in the exercise of
power, or, as he thought, of virtue; and the people, safe in
their obscurity, applauded the danger and debasement of their
superiors. This extraordinary rigor was justified, in some
measure, by its salutary consequences; since, after a scrutiny of
seventeen days, not a complaint or abuse could be found in the
court or city; and it might be alleged that the Greeks could be
ruled only with a rod of iron, and that the public interest is
the motive and law of the supreme judge. Yet in the crime, or
the suspicion, of treason, that judge is of all others the most
credulous and partial. Theophilus might inflict a tardy
vengeance on the assassins of Leo and the saviors of his father;
but he enjoyed the fruits of their crime; and his jealous tyranny
sacrificed a brother and a prince to the future safety of his
life. A Persian of the race of the Sassanides died in poverty
and exile at Constantinople, leaving an only son, the issue of a
plebeian marriage. At the age of twelve years, the royal birth
of Theophobus was revealed, and his merit was not unworthy of his
birth. He was educated in the Byzantine palace, a Christian and
a soldier; advanced with rapid steps in the career of fortune and
glory; received the hand of the emperor's sister; and was
promoted to the command of thirty thousand Persians, who, like
his father, had fled from the Mahometan conquerors. These
troops, doubly infected with mercenary and fanatic vices, were
desirous of revolting against their benefactor, and erecting the
standard of their native king but the loyal Theophobus rejected
their offers, disconcerted their schemes, and escaped from their
hands to the camp or palace of his royal brother. A generous
confidence might have secured a faithful and able guardian for
his wife and his infant son, to whom Theophilus, in the flower of
his age, was compelled to leave the inheritance of the empire.
But his jealousy was exasperated by envy and disease; he feared
the dangerous virtues which might either support or oppress their
infancy and weakness; and the dying emperor demanded the head of
the Persian prince. With savage delight he recognized the
familiar features of his brother: "Thou art no longer
Theophobus," he said; and, sinking on his couch, he added, with a
faltering voice, "Soon, too soon, I shall be no more Theophilus!"
Prev
| Next
| Contents
|